Teststation for solceller
Hvad er solceller?
Solceller i Danmark
Beregningsprogrammer til solceller
Solcelle selvbyg kursus
Spørgsmål & svar vedr. solceller
Forhandlere af solceller
Skatteregler for ve-anlæg
Solcelleproduktion på Folkecenter lige nu
Udnyttelse af varmen i solceller
Transportable solceller
Sol tracker
Solindstråling i Danmark
Inverter til solcelleanlæg
Bliv selvforsynet med el i 30 år
Termofotografering af solceller
Kombineret solcelle og solfanger - hybridsolpanel
Hvordan fungerer solceller?
Flydende solenergianlæg
Kugleformede solceller
Byg dit eget solcelleanlæg
Tynd film vejledning
Space Based Solar Power - Elektricitet fra rummet
Prisfald på solceller
  Billigere solceller
Solar Bundesliga
Energi fra ørkenen
Teknologi transfer indenfor solenergi
Albedo effekten
Solenergi til køling - is fra solen
Solceller på Folkecenteret
Publikationer & downloads indenfor sol
Links til solenergi
Til Folketingets energipolitiske udvalg
 Regulering i el-systemet

Billigere solceller.



En ny rapport skrvet af Paul Maycock og Travis Bradford forudsiger, at prisen på solceller vil falde med 50% inden år 2015. Læs mere nedenfor.


December 13, 2006



Report: Paul Maycock and Travis Bradford, PV Energy Systems and the Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development


Authors predict 50% drop in costs of manufacturing PV components by 2015.


 The world of current and emerging photovoltaic (PV) technologies is the focus of a new report from authors Paul Maycock and Travis Bradford, from PV Energy Systems and the Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development, respectively. They address the performance of PV technologies and offer analysis, efficiencies and cost projections of the dominant technologies used in the photovoltaic (PV) industry today, including monocrystalline PV, multicrystalline PV, silicon ribbon and sheet, amorphous silicon, Copper Indium Diselenide (CIS)/Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide (CIGS), and concentrator cells. Maycock and Bradford, with a combined 50+ years in the PV industry, predict up to a 50% drop in the manufacturing cost of PV components by 2015 after careful analysis of silicon shortages, laboratory vs. production conditions, and emerging technologies.

Module efficiencies are important in determining the system performance by area; this factor can lead into economic issues involving the balance-of-systems (BOS) components and maximum system output when space is a constraint.


The Field of PV Technologies
In the last decade, over 1,000 MW of new cell and module plants, primarily using multicrystalline silicon, have made much progress in increasing efficiency, increasing factory size, and reducing costs. The manufacturing cost and efficiency improvement forecasts made in the 1995 edition of this report have, for the most part, become reality. These cost reductions, primarily due to volume purchasing of raw materials and reduced silicon consumption owing to thinner slices and higher efficiency, have resulted in new plants with fully burdened module manufacturing costs at the USD 2.40-2.75 per peak Watt (DC) level. (Note: these costs do include the recent rise in the cost of pure polysilicon from an average of USD 20/kilogram in 2001 to over USD 50/kilogram in 2006.)

Conversely, most new amorphous silicon plants built in the last ten years have exceeded design costs and failed to reach design goals for efficiency and yields. With costs exceeding prices, the markets forecast for amorphous silicon power modules have not fully developed, though recent strong PV demand has led to resurgence in interest in the last year. One major new application for amorphous silicon is the use of flexible amorphous modules on membrane roofs and on standing seam metal roofs.

Like the amorphous silicon plants, Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) and Copper Indium (Gallium) di-Selinide (CIS or CIGS) pilot plants in the last decade have been delayed several years from original announcements for a variety of reasons, including lower than expected yields and difficulty with in situ interconnections and migration to large area formats.

Once adequate product stability (less than 1% annual degradation in electric output) and life of service (at least 25 years backed by an adequate warranty) are established, two factors are important in understanding the competitiveness and usefulness of any PV technology. These are the module's efficiency and its cost.

Module Efficiencies by Technology
Module efficiencies are important in determining the system performance by area; this factor can lead into economic issues involving the balance-of-systems (BOS) components and maximum system output when space is a constraint. It is important to focus on average, stable module production efficiencies here, as laboratory or best efficiencies may cloud comparisons across technologies.

Monocrystalline silicon modules can now be made at 18 percent efficiency, due primarily to the work of three leading silicon theorists and experimenters: Dr. Richard Swanson (SunPower), Professor Ageet Rohatgi (Georgia Institute of Technology) and Prof. Martin Greene (University of New South Wales). We forecast maximum module efficiency at 22-25 percent, with cell efficiency at 23-25 percent by 2015. SunPower's recent announcement of a 22%-efficient cell suggests that the technology is already moving quickly to meet that goal.

a-Si/monocrystalline (HIT) is made by depositing a layer of amorphous silicon on a monocrystalline slice. Currently produced by Sanyo, which refers to the technology as HIT, cell efficiencies are currently up to 18 percent, improving to 22-24 percent efficient by 2015, and will give the best of monocrystalline silicon modules a very tight race for module efficiency leadership.

Multicrystalline silicon modules will remain about a tenth less efficient than comparable monocrystalline silicon modules, due to the heterogeneous nature of the wafer. While only in the mid-teens today, these modules should still achieve efficiencies above 20 percent in the next decade.

Silicon ribbon and sheet (multicrystalline) modules will be about the same efficiency as cast ingot multicrystalline silicon modules, having closed the gap in the last few years. Essentially, these technologies create nearly identical multicrystalline wafers to the sawn ingots with significantly reduced silicon losses and fewer process steps from silicon to wafer.

Amorphous silicon and Cadmium Telluride